Skip to main content

Chapter 3 HMWK

  1. What surprised you most about the concepts in this chapter?  Why?
  2. What is your opinion about international trade?  Overall is it good or bad?  Why?
  3. Did your opinion about trade change after reading the chapter? Go back to your thoughts on the buy local movement in your first reflection.  Can we think about trade with China and trade with Wyoming in the same way? Why or why not?
  4. Give an example of a recent purchase you made that was primarily produced overseas.  Was there a locally produced option? How much more would you be willing to pay for the locally produced option? Why?  If you did pay more, was there a trade-off?

The thing that stood out to me in this chapter was the interplay between absolute advantage and comparative advantage. The illustration of Serena Williams giving up a $30,000 TV commercial just because she can mow the lawn better than anyone else doesn't mean she should. I also like the story about splitting up household chores to equalize effectiveness on the final task each person is doing.

International trade is good because it allows those who are most efficient at certain types of production to leverage that in trade. When production increases, so should wages for workers. And trade also helps reduce the opportunity cost for the trade partners who choose to consume the product.

One of my first comments in response to the international garment industry was based more on concern for working conditions in a factory than on overall economic well-being. After watching a 'fair trade' video, I realized that job may very well be the better option for some people.

I'm not sure how closely related trade with China and trade with Wyoming are. It seems that if it is more efficient, it shouldn't matter who you trade with. It seems that most objections to international trade are political...and in the end it means that we may have to work harder to produce the same product locally.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 22 Reflection

Inflation and unemployment have an inverse relationship. You can ’t have both become lower at the same time, but policymakers can decide acceptable threshold levels which will then inform which is more of a priority to pursue. It is good that people work at jobs, because then the GDP rises, which improves the nation’s economy as they become more efficient. But you see, a s more people get jobs, their income rises, and then their consumption also increases. Increased consumption means that prices generally rise as the goods go to the highest bidder. Workers in turn will demand higher wages in order to keep up with these rising prices, or inflation. So in the end, as unemployment decreases inflation will increase. I ’m not so sure that there really is a trade-off, as it seems to be more of a feedback cycle rather than something that can be legislated. And this feedback cycle seems to have a historic pattern as well. But overall, neither factor alone totally conveys the quality o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 17 Reflection

Inflation is an increase in the money supply. Prices appear to become higher because currency loses its value, so it requires more money to buy the same item. People may begin to hoard groceries in order to get the most bang for their buck. This can create a feedback loop as people seek to spend their earnings rather than allow it to depreciate. Deflation is a constriction of the money supply. Prices appear to become lower, and people may delay their purchases in order to save money... so the economy stagnates. In addition, consumers have less disposable income after they have paid for the necessities because their wages are typically smaller. If wages are smaller, then any pre-existing debt becomes more difficult to pay off. This can be a dangerous position because the USA's economy increasingly relies on debt.
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 18 Reflection

Seeing how the flow of goods and services is related to the flow of capital in international markets is interesting. Selling a good to a foreign party increases your exports, and when you buy foreign products with the foreign currency you have received you are increasing imports. The question of whether domestic citizens or foreign people are investing more heavily will determine whether there is a trade surplus or deficit. But this is a multi-faceted label, and more factors must be observed in order to determine how it affects a nation's well-being. I'm curious to know more about the economic changes that occurred when the EU countries initially adopted the Euro. How did the differing exchange rates determine how many Euros each country would be given? How did that affect their ability to grow?
Post a Comment
Read more