Skip to main content

Chapter 21 HMWK

This is a complicated chapter.  What did you find most confusing?  What do you think about the concept of indifference curves in the context of budget constraints?
Does the concept of indifference curves add to your understanding of demand curves?  The existence of prices and income clearly leads to budget constraints.  Do you think about trade-offs for large purchases (ie a car payment versus rent/mortgage)?  How about small purchases?  Does timing matter (probably you aren't purchasing both a car and a house at the same time)?  How does the concept of indifference curves inform your thinking about purchases?




Indifference curves help me visualize the optimal levels in the trade-off between two choices. But there is still much room for ambiguity depending on consumer preferences, influenced by whether the income effect or substitution effect is greater. Although the graphs helped me see how the changing prices affected the outcome, I had to read through the mathematical reasoning several times and still probably couldn't explain the equations. But from my own consumer behavior I could relate to the thought process.

I tend to think about trade-offs more for larger purchases. I'd rather have a car loan than a mortgage because I value having less financial obligations and more flexibility. While the difference between a car loan of $200/mo and $250/mo wouldn't cause me any hardship, after 5 years it could greatly influence the amount I'm able to save for a vacation. So I'd probably go for the smaller loan because I value travel.

For smaller purchases, sometimes I think about trade-offs when buying bulk food. Even though a 10 pound bag of rice costs more upfront and takes away the opportunity to be able to use that money to enjoy other things right now, I know that in the long run I will spend less money per ounce and overall will have more to spend later.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23 Reflection

I was glad to learn more about how interest rates affect the overall economy, as well as the cues that coincide with decisions to manipulate the interest rate. I ’m most interested in the arguments regarding government funded projects as well as a balanced government budget. On the one hand, I can see how money can trickle down from the government to the people when public projects are implemented. Construction jobs are sustained when bridges need to be built. However, it should be noted that this does not necessarily affect the job security within the industry itself. It’s great if businesses can win contracts, but what actually happens when the project is finished? How much has it actually changed the community itself, or has it just lined the pockets of a few? Also, how does the government decide which projects are most necessary? And in order to fund it, aren’t they raising taxes overall? It seems that when governments attempt to somehow increase public welfare by increasi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 22 Reflection

Inflation and unemployment have an inverse relationship. You can ’t have both become lower at the same time, but policymakers can decide acceptable threshold levels which will then inform which is more of a priority to pursue. It is good that people work at jobs, because then the GDP rises, which improves the nation’s economy as they become more efficient. But you see, a s more people get jobs, their income rises, and then their consumption also increases. Increased consumption means that prices generally rise as the goods go to the highest bidder. Workers in turn will demand higher wages in order to keep up with these rising prices, or inflation. So in the end, as unemployment decreases inflation will increase. I ’m not so sure that there really is a trade-off, as it seems to be more of a feedback cycle rather than something that can be legislated. And this feedback cycle seems to have a historic pattern as well. But overall, neither factor alone totally conveys the quality o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 20 reflection

This chapter talks about how the government's fiscal policy influences aggregate supply and aggregate demand regarding the money supply. The Fed sets the interest rate, and when they make a change it impacts the opportunity cost people face when deciding whether to spend or save money. This in turn affects how much money is supplied and demanded within the economy. The government can make choices about the purchases it makes or taxes it imposes, and this in turn affects many people's paychecks. Overall, it influences people's consumer spending. Pessimism and optimism can cause people to change their demand for money, and on a large scale certain repeated actions can trigger a recession or inflation. Both the Fed and the government use their policies to attempt to stabilize these fluctuations.
Post a Comment
Read more