Skip to main content

Chapter 10 HMWK

This is generally a very interesting chapter for everyone.  What is an  example of a negative externality that interests you?  Could the problem be solved via negotiation (Coase Theorem)?  Why or why not? Do you favor regulation to solve this externality?  Why or why not?  
(Don't respond "pollution".  Be specific.  What type of pollution, caused by what. There are many examples of externalities beyond "pollution" and of course many many types of pollution.)
Would you regulate your example via a tax or via a rule?  Why do you prefer one solution over the other?




An example of a negative externality are cargo ships that pollute the ocean and endanger marine life. Nobody owns the ocean so it would be difficult to sue them, but everyone who lives along the shore or who wants to enjoy eating seafood is negatively affected without being compensated. It would be very difficult for the shipping companies to bargain with large populations over many geographic areas, so it would be easier to use regulation to solve this externality. Perhaps requiring shipping routes to be so many miles away from shore as well as selling permits to pollute would help balance the impact.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23 Reflection

I was glad to learn more about how interest rates affect the overall economy, as well as the cues that coincide with decisions to manipulate the interest rate. I ’m most interested in the arguments regarding government funded projects as well as a balanced government budget. On the one hand, I can see how money can trickle down from the government to the people when public projects are implemented. Construction jobs are sustained when bridges need to be built. However, it should be noted that this does not necessarily affect the job security within the industry itself. It’s great if businesses can win contracts, but what actually happens when the project is finished? How much has it actually changed the community itself, or has it just lined the pockets of a few? Also, how does the government decide which projects are most necessary? And in order to fund it, aren’t they raising taxes overall? It seems that when governments attempt to somehow increase public welfare by increasi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 22 Reflection

Inflation and unemployment have an inverse relationship. You can ’t have both become lower at the same time, but policymakers can decide acceptable threshold levels which will then inform which is more of a priority to pursue. It is good that people work at jobs, because then the GDP rises, which improves the nation’s economy as they become more efficient. But you see, a s more people get jobs, their income rises, and then their consumption also increases. Increased consumption means that prices generally rise as the goods go to the highest bidder. Workers in turn will demand higher wages in order to keep up with these rising prices, or inflation. So in the end, as unemployment decreases inflation will increase. I ’m not so sure that there really is a trade-off, as it seems to be more of a feedback cycle rather than something that can be legislated. And this feedback cycle seems to have a historic pattern as well. But overall, neither factor alone totally conveys the quality o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Chapter 17 Reflection

Inflation is an increase in the money supply. Prices appear to become higher because currency loses its value, so it requires more money to buy the same item. People may begin to hoard groceries in order to get the most bang for their buck. This can create a feedback loop as people seek to spend their earnings rather than allow it to depreciate. Deflation is a constriction of the money supply. Prices appear to become lower, and people may delay their purchases in order to save money... so the economy stagnates. In addition, consumers have less disposable income after they have paid for the necessities because their wages are typically smaller. If wages are smaller, then any pre-existing debt becomes more difficult to pay off. This can be a dangerous position because the USA's economy increasingly relies on debt.
Post a Comment
Read more