Skip to main content

Chapter 9 HMWK

After reading these essays what do you think about protecting manufacturing industries from international trade? Who will benefit from the tariffs on steel and aluminum?  Who will lose?  Do you think more people will benefit than will lose? Why or why not?
Look up the employment trends in manufacturing.  (Try the Bureau of Labor Statistics).  When did manufacturing employment reach its peak? Why do you believe manufacturing employment is declining?




Just like an earlier example in the textbook about how technological innovations have made it possible for only 3% of the US population to produce our food, it is not surprising that manufacturing industry jobs are also declining in the same manner. But even as the demand for basic jobs decreases, it will only transfer demand because now we'll need people to oversee the technologies and work in other fields that are the result of innovation. Increasing productivity is what will bolster economic welfare.

Setting tariffs on steel and aluminum in order to protect domestic manufacturing industries from more competitive world markets will make domestic sellers better off but domestic buyers will be worse off. A tariff improves the welfare of domestic sellers, but because of the deadweight losses from the tax, domestic buyers will be worse off. In turn, buyers will have less money (whatever the size of the tariff) to spend in other industries. So more people will lose than will benefit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23 Reflection

I was glad to learn more about how interest rates affect the overall economy, as well as the cues that coincide with decisions to manipulate the interest rate. I ’m most interested in the arguments regarding government funded projects as well as a balanced government budget. On the one hand, I can see how money can trickle down from the government to the people when public projects are implemented. Construction jobs are sustained when bridges need to be built. However, it should be noted that this does not necessarily affect the job security within the industry itself. It’s great if businesses can win contracts, but what actually happens when the project is finished? How much has it actually changed the community itself, or has it just lined the pockets of a few? Also, how does the government decide which projects are most necessary? And in order to fund it, aren’t they raising taxes overall? It seems that when governments attempt to somehow increase public welfare by increasi...

Chapter 22 Reflection

Inflation and unemployment have an inverse relationship. You can ’t have both become lower at the same time, but policymakers can decide acceptable threshold levels which will then inform which is more of a priority to pursue. It is good that people work at jobs, because then the GDP rises, which improves the nation’s economy as they become more efficient. But you see, a s more people get jobs, their income rises, and then their consumption also increases. Increased consumption means that prices generally rise as the goods go to the highest bidder. Workers in turn will demand higher wages in order to keep up with these rising prices, or inflation. So in the end, as unemployment decreases inflation will increase. I ’m not so sure that there really is a trade-off, as it seems to be more of a feedback cycle rather than something that can be legislated. And this feedback cycle seems to have a historic pattern as well. But overall, neither factor alone totally conveys the quality o...

Chapter 20 reflection

This chapter talks about how the government's fiscal policy influences aggregate supply and aggregate demand regarding the money supply. The Fed sets the interest rate, and when they make a change it impacts the opportunity cost people face when deciding whether to spend or save money. This in turn affects how much money is supplied and demanded within the economy. The government can make choices about the purchases it makes or taxes it imposes, and this in turn affects many people's paychecks. Overall, it influences people's consumer spending. Pessimism and optimism can cause people to change their demand for money, and on a large scale certain repeated actions can trigger a recession or inflation. Both the Fed and the government use their policies to attempt to stabilize these fluctuations.