Skip to main content

Chapter 3 HMWK

  1. What surprised you most about the concepts in this chapter?  Why?
  2. What is your opinion about international trade?  Overall is it good or bad?  Why?
  3. Did your opinion about trade change after reading the chapter? Go back to your thoughts on the buy local movement in your first reflection.  Can we think about trade with China and trade with Wyoming in the same way? Why or why not?
  4. Give an example of a recent purchase you made that was primarily produced overseas.  Was there a locally produced option? How much more would you be willing to pay for the locally produced option? Why?  If you did pay more, was there a trade-off?

The thing that stood out to me in this chapter was the interplay between absolute advantage and comparative advantage. The illustration of Serena Williams giving up a $30,000 TV commercial just because she can mow the lawn better than anyone else doesn't mean she should. I also like the story about splitting up household chores to equalize effectiveness on the final task each person is doing.

International trade is good because it allows those who are most efficient at certain types of production to leverage that in trade. When production increases, so should wages for workers. And trade also helps reduce the opportunity cost for the trade partners who choose to consume the product.

One of my first comments in response to the international garment industry was based more on concern for working conditions in a factory than on overall economic well-being. After watching a 'fair trade' video, I realized that job may very well be the better option for some people.

I'm not sure how closely related trade with China and trade with Wyoming are. It seems that if it is more efficient, it shouldn't matter who you trade with. It seems that most objections to international trade are political...and in the end it means that we may have to work harder to produce the same product locally.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 23 Reflection

I was glad to learn more about how interest rates affect the overall economy, as well as the cues that coincide with decisions to manipulate the interest rate. I ’m most interested in the arguments regarding government funded projects as well as a balanced government budget. On the one hand, I can see how money can trickle down from the government to the people when public projects are implemented. Construction jobs are sustained when bridges need to be built. However, it should be noted that this does not necessarily affect the job security within the industry itself. It’s great if businesses can win contracts, but what actually happens when the project is finished? How much has it actually changed the community itself, or has it just lined the pockets of a few? Also, how does the government decide which projects are most necessary? And in order to fund it, aren’t they raising taxes overall? It seems that when governments attempt to somehow increase public welfare by increasi...

Chapter 22 Reflection

Inflation and unemployment have an inverse relationship. You can ’t have both become lower at the same time, but policymakers can decide acceptable threshold levels which will then inform which is more of a priority to pursue. It is good that people work at jobs, because then the GDP rises, which improves the nation’s economy as they become more efficient. But you see, a s more people get jobs, their income rises, and then their consumption also increases. Increased consumption means that prices generally rise as the goods go to the highest bidder. Workers in turn will demand higher wages in order to keep up with these rising prices, or inflation. So in the end, as unemployment decreases inflation will increase. I ’m not so sure that there really is a trade-off, as it seems to be more of a feedback cycle rather than something that can be legislated. And this feedback cycle seems to have a historic pattern as well. But overall, neither factor alone totally conveys the quality o...

Chapter 20 reflection

This chapter talks about how the government's fiscal policy influences aggregate supply and aggregate demand regarding the money supply. The Fed sets the interest rate, and when they make a change it impacts the opportunity cost people face when deciding whether to spend or save money. This in turn affects how much money is supplied and demanded within the economy. The government can make choices about the purchases it makes or taxes it imposes, and this in turn affects many people's paychecks. Overall, it influences people's consumer spending. Pessimism and optimism can cause people to change their demand for money, and on a large scale certain repeated actions can trigger a recession or inflation. Both the Fed and the government use their policies to attempt to stabilize these fluctuations.